The evolution of programming versus evolution neighborhoods: Linux versus bacteria | plant to express anniversary: labo of activities, and ideas and Oxia ... and heck
On the way to prepare the computers capable of dealing with the world on the human brain pattern ability and its complexity, a recent study of the fundamental differences between biological and computer labo programming revealed that by comparing conducted at Yale Yale University on Escherichia bacteria coli Escherichia coli and the system of the famous Linux Linux computer operating.
Drawing (see photo above) shows the evolution of the two processes landmarks (Escherichia coli versus Linux), biology or biology driven programming random mutations and natural selection, while the program is only intelligent design labo is no more.
Of the most important and the most difficult problems in biological data processing is the lack of knowledge of their meanings and functions, ie they are just a bunch of nonsense if it is not structured on the map and find out all its own merits as a researcher labo at the Informatics said Marc Grstein Marc Gerstein. The system also develops Linux But unlike labo biological evolution, we know precisely what happens Grstein adds.
Several years ago, a researcher technology systems to get a clear structure of the genes in the form of a map showing the genes interact with each other. At the top of the organization, we find the leading gene, which leads the work of many genes, and at the bottom there are working genes, labo which pumps the protein code, while the middle genes are joint actions between the highest and lowest.
In recent study published in the April 4 (April 2010) Compare Grstein labo between Escherichia bacteria colic and Linux, where network bacteria systems appear hierarchy where there is little of Presidents organizers and a lot of actors and working in the bottom of the pyramid, driving orders for Linux opposite form where There are a lot of key administrative processes, which oversees the little labo joint operations.
Gene network systems become closer to the network for Linux, the more complex objects as indicated by biological study co-author Sergei Maslov Sergei Maslov, but at the same time will not become a gene networks sufficiently coordinated systems as Linux and completely explain that the study
Asked whether the evolution in computer programming has exceeded normal development, Grstein replied that the opposite is true, in terms of information systems remain fragile compared to natural organisms because it is simply the evolution of biology allows adaptation with random mutations and sudden changes.
Click to print (open in new window) Click to send this e-mail to a friend (opens in new window) posted on Facebook (opens in new window) Click to post on Twitter (opens in new window) Click to post on Reddit (open in new window)
This entry was posted on 9 مايو, 2010 at Hussein sands and is filed under Computers, scientific discoveries, biology, genes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 3 comments to "the evolution of programming compared to the evolution of neighborhoods: Linux versus bacteria" moukadem Says: 9 مايو, 2010 at Hussein sands | Reply
Say I am supposed labo Qlk Shi, and you uncle cased p excretory Qlk him: a sweet job with you Alawavat Elk and greetings Alskokaaah worldview: in the search for Noor plant to express anniversary: of activities, and ideas and Oxia ... and heck Says: 25 مايو, 2010 at Hussein sands | Reply
You are attached using an account Facebook. (Log out / Change)
Sorry, your site can not post threads through e-mail.
% D bloggers like this:
On the way to prepare the computers capable of dealing with the world on the human brain pattern ability and its complexity, a recent study of the fundamental differences between biological and computer labo programming revealed that by comparing conducted at Yale Yale University on Escherichia bacteria coli Escherichia coli and the system of the famous Linux Linux computer operating.
Drawing (see photo above) shows the evolution of the two processes landmarks (Escherichia coli versus Linux), biology or biology driven programming random mutations and natural selection, while the program is only intelligent design labo is no more.
Of the most important and the most difficult problems in biological data processing is the lack of knowledge of their meanings and functions, ie they are just a bunch of nonsense if it is not structured on the map and find out all its own merits as a researcher labo at the Informatics said Marc Grstein Marc Gerstein. The system also develops Linux But unlike labo biological evolution, we know precisely what happens Grstein adds.
Several years ago, a researcher technology systems to get a clear structure of the genes in the form of a map showing the genes interact with each other. At the top of the organization, we find the leading gene, which leads the work of many genes, and at the bottom there are working genes, labo which pumps the protein code, while the middle genes are joint actions between the highest and lowest.
In recent study published in the April 4 (April 2010) Compare Grstein labo between Escherichia bacteria colic and Linux, where network bacteria systems appear hierarchy where there is little of Presidents organizers and a lot of actors and working in the bottom of the pyramid, driving orders for Linux opposite form where There are a lot of key administrative processes, which oversees the little labo joint operations.
Gene network systems become closer to the network for Linux, the more complex objects as indicated by biological study co-author Sergei Maslov Sergei Maslov, but at the same time will not become a gene networks sufficiently coordinated systems as Linux and completely explain that the study
Asked whether the evolution in computer programming has exceeded normal development, Grstein replied that the opposite is true, in terms of information systems remain fragile compared to natural organisms because it is simply the evolution of biology allows adaptation with random mutations and sudden changes.
Click to print (open in new window) Click to send this e-mail to a friend (opens in new window) posted on Facebook (opens in new window) Click to post on Twitter (opens in new window) Click to post on Reddit (open in new window)
This entry was posted on 9 مايو, 2010 at Hussein sands and is filed under Computers, scientific discoveries, biology, genes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 3 comments to "the evolution of programming compared to the evolution of neighborhoods: Linux versus bacteria" moukadem Says: 9 مايو, 2010 at Hussein sands | Reply
Say I am supposed labo Qlk Shi, and you uncle cased p excretory Qlk him: a sweet job with you Alawavat Elk and greetings Alskokaaah worldview: in the search for Noor plant to express anniversary: of activities, and ideas and Oxia ... and heck Says: 25 مايو, 2010 at Hussein sands | Reply
You are attached using an account Facebook. (Log out / Change)
Sorry, your site can not post threads through e-mail.
% D bloggers like this:
No comments:
Post a Comment