The little orange book free access | The Counter Open Access
Philosophy professor Peter Suber is now director of the Harvard Office organism for Scholarly Communicati on. His writings, activities and commitments make him one of the most respected and listened to on the issue of free access specialists. In his latest book, Open Access, published by MIT press in the "Essential Knowledge" series, it offers a reasoned introduction to open access in clear language, combining pedagogy pragmatism. Released in 2012, the book is available for download under Creative Commo ns since June 15, 2013 It should soon be translated into French.
Peter Suber, we devrio ns Prioritize the transition from a world dominated by the conventional publishing to pay a world where open access is the norm. To achieve this, the main obstacles are neither technical nor legal nor economic but cultural: as low prestige journals or new fears filed on perceived circumvention of the scientific assessment records. Assuming that the opposition to open access in the field of scientific publishing organism are caused by misunderstandings, Suber is working organism to dismantle them one by one seriously considering the arguments against.
In this struggle, open access is aided by the fact that the authors of scientific journals do not write for money and wish above all to collect organism a maximum impact, based on the widest possible dissemination of their work. As summarized by Peter Suber well: "We would have less knowledge, less academic freedom and less free access if researchers working for money and were doing their academic papers consumer goods rather than grants." 1
In practice, free access will drop or lower three types of barriers: financial, legal (related intellectual property) and those for data reuse. All this, without undermining organism or eliminating the concept of authority, which are often reported as threatened by internet and practices - among other collaborative organism - that new information technologies and communication in their wake. Needless to rely on altruism researchers for this transition to free access by Suber: play on their own interests more than enough as better dissemination of their work would increase (almost) mechanically impact 2 and thus their chances of promotion. organism Peter Suber and takes up the formula Stevan Harnad for which an academic article organism is an advertisement for the work of the author. By this reasoning, why continue to pay for something that we do not fund as a consumer?
Throughout the ten chapters that make up this short essay very accessible, Peter Suber clearly define the concept of open access, it does not cover and why should encourage us to implement: proliferation and dissemination of knowledge , economic unsustainability of academic organism publishing, etc. Among the most illuminating passages, we read with profit its inventory of different forms of open access (greenway, Golden Path and in the latter the distinction between free or paid submission fee), 3 which may be caused confusion. Indeed, many researchers reduce free access to the Golden Path and author-pays model, 4 whereas it is in fact a minority and often biased by conventional publishers solution. The author instead the complementarity of green and golden paths: if there is no good open access journal in a field, the deposit is now authorized by the vast majority of editors, encouraged by the university organism policies (mandates) and funders of research such as the Wellcome Trust and the National Institute of Health in the United States.
With this work complete synthesis, the author does not neglect any aspect. Open access is not limited to journal articles, but key (ra) memoirs, theses, data and more books. Issues of copyright is of course addressed, albeit briefly, while the economics (how much does it cost? Is it profitable?) And the likely impacts of development on open access publishing organism ecosystem are not ignored .
The book concludes with two illuminating chapters: the first on the future of open access, victim of its success and its continual rediscovery by new converts who tend to repeat Malente
Philosophy professor Peter Suber is now director of the Harvard Office organism for Scholarly Communicati on. His writings, activities and commitments make him one of the most respected and listened to on the issue of free access specialists. In his latest book, Open Access, published by MIT press in the "Essential Knowledge" series, it offers a reasoned introduction to open access in clear language, combining pedagogy pragmatism. Released in 2012, the book is available for download under Creative Commo ns since June 15, 2013 It should soon be translated into French.
Peter Suber, we devrio ns Prioritize the transition from a world dominated by the conventional publishing to pay a world where open access is the norm. To achieve this, the main obstacles are neither technical nor legal nor economic but cultural: as low prestige journals or new fears filed on perceived circumvention of the scientific assessment records. Assuming that the opposition to open access in the field of scientific publishing organism are caused by misunderstandings, Suber is working organism to dismantle them one by one seriously considering the arguments against.
In this struggle, open access is aided by the fact that the authors of scientific journals do not write for money and wish above all to collect organism a maximum impact, based on the widest possible dissemination of their work. As summarized by Peter Suber well: "We would have less knowledge, less academic freedom and less free access if researchers working for money and were doing their academic papers consumer goods rather than grants." 1
In practice, free access will drop or lower three types of barriers: financial, legal (related intellectual property) and those for data reuse. All this, without undermining organism or eliminating the concept of authority, which are often reported as threatened by internet and practices - among other collaborative organism - that new information technologies and communication in their wake. Needless to rely on altruism researchers for this transition to free access by Suber: play on their own interests more than enough as better dissemination of their work would increase (almost) mechanically impact 2 and thus their chances of promotion. organism Peter Suber and takes up the formula Stevan Harnad for which an academic article organism is an advertisement for the work of the author. By this reasoning, why continue to pay for something that we do not fund as a consumer?
Throughout the ten chapters that make up this short essay very accessible, Peter Suber clearly define the concept of open access, it does not cover and why should encourage us to implement: proliferation and dissemination of knowledge , economic unsustainability of academic organism publishing, etc. Among the most illuminating passages, we read with profit its inventory of different forms of open access (greenway, Golden Path and in the latter the distinction between free or paid submission fee), 3 which may be caused confusion. Indeed, many researchers reduce free access to the Golden Path and author-pays model, 4 whereas it is in fact a minority and often biased by conventional publishers solution. The author instead the complementarity of green and golden paths: if there is no good open access journal in a field, the deposit is now authorized by the vast majority of editors, encouraged by the university organism policies (mandates) and funders of research such as the Wellcome Trust and the National Institute of Health in the United States.
With this work complete synthesis, the author does not neglect any aspect. Open access is not limited to journal articles, but key (ra) memoirs, theses, data and more books. Issues of copyright is of course addressed, albeit briefly, while the economics (how much does it cost? Is it profitable?) And the likely impacts of development on open access publishing organism ecosystem are not ignored .
The book concludes with two illuminating chapters: the first on the future of open access, victim of its success and its continual rediscovery by new converts who tend to repeat Malente
No comments:
Post a Comment