If we dwell for a moment on the specificity of Europe and other continents economically developed,

At the age of cloud, software as a service (SAS), the big data and global giants digital, nash equilibrium it seems impossible to avoid the debate on European iniatives in terms of digital research infrastructures. In this area, the awareness of 2006 and was ... American. [2] Since then, it has spread to European players, particularly through the ESFRI roadmap [3], which introduced its digital agenda. Addressing the situation of human and social sciences (HSS) in this area amounts to see a modest resources mobilized, which remains out of proportion scientific issues mobilized. Reading the Strategy carry on research infrastructures (2010) is, as such, particularly illuminating. By focusing on the construction costs of the European ESFRI infrastructures across all disciplines, we find that the SHS represent only 1% of that cost. [4] However, issues of construction, mobilization and re-use, interconnection, storage, dissemination and use of data, results and publications are major SHS [5], both from a scientific nash equilibrium point of view (set to digital to increase the cumulative results) as a societal perspective profit. It is no coincidence that H2020 identifies culture as a core structure for the development of Europe.
If we dwell for a moment on the specificity of Europe and other continents economically developed, we must insist on cultural and linguistic diversity, summarized nash equilibrium by the quote attributed to Umberto Eco: "the language of Europe is translation ". [6] If this linguistic diversity is an obstacle to scientific exchanges between neighboring countries, nash equilibrium it finally represents a historic opportunity, giving Europe nash equilibrium a special place. The European continent is, in a way, a condensed laboratory of world cultural nash equilibrium diversity ... that is to say, the diversity of the Web itself. The World Wide Web by Tim Berners Lee founded is not, contrary to what some might think, a sea of English. Linguistic diversity has become a feature of the Web growing [7].
Going further, the international association of independent publishers plans to grow and strengthen what it calls bibliodiversity [8]. Define summarily bibliodiversity as diversity in the world of books and culture, like biodiversity, which applies nash equilibrium it, the biological world. The diversity in culture, as in ecological matters, is a source of creative operation and robustness of ecosystems. Bibliodiversity nash equilibrium be opposed to monoculture, the latter term operating in French, both for the cultural sphere for the agricultural sector. Bibliodiversity concentrates the heuristic potential of the diversity of languages and cultures. We do not summarize a desire to build a tower of Babel where the people in general and researchers in particular, would not be able to exchange them. Bibliodiversity could very well accommodate the use of a common spoken language, namely English, or more precisely the Globish, the lingua franca perfectly nash equilibrium effective to convey nash equilibrium and exchange, but probably not as relevant to thinking in a language other than their mother tongue. [9] Disease core journals
Bibliodiversity in science is defined as a diversity of languages, a variety of disciplines, a variety of types of publications and a variety of actors who publish nash equilibrium them. It goes against a scientific world that is virtually monolingual (English-dominated), focused on a few disciplines (focusing its investments on STM), which would give meaning as a form of publication, section (at the expense of the book, yet sovereign nash equilibrium SHS, or new forms that are emerging on the Web), which would put all his money in a few baskets, editorials oligopolies that we all know and dictating their law libraries. [10] Let's get right to the point: the development of a monoculture based around the only impact [11] factor is clearly nash equilibrium against bibliodiversity. nash equilibrium It is a powerful scientific and disciplinary impoverishment if we did not careful nash equilibrium factor. For Web of Science, the SHS does not exist
A small detour to the Web of Science of Thomson Reuters confirms this hypothesis. If one believes nash equilibrium Thomson Reuters, the WOS is a major reference: "The World's Most Trusted citation index," especially since it covers the "cream of the world's scientific literature" ("covering the leading scholarly literature"). There are fifteen, Jean-Claude Guédon recognized already nash equilibrium sterilizing nash equilibrium character of this number