The amendment to the Law on Electronic Communications | Fabik homepage
Ministry of Transport, Posts and Telecommunications in mid-September this year prepared jefferson lab an amendment to the Electronic Communications Act. In the framework of commenting procedure Interior Ministry raised to this amendment several key observations. The content of these comments were not entirely new proposals duties so. operators of publicly jefferson lab available Internet forums and a ban on so-called. Anonymizer. Prohibition on the use anonymizer
Anonymizer Department defines as a service, "which prevents or makes it difficult to identify the user of the Internet" and his ministry proposes to ban use. The ban should jefferson lab apply to everyone exemption should only have "authorized state body or authority law enforcement." Ministry ban on the argument that anonymisers are increasingly abused Internet users to hide their true identity in crime. "By using this service, the offender jefferson lab allocated another (masking) IP address and in this way it becomes jefferson lab almost imperceptible for their criminal activities. In the vast majority are assigned IP addresses geographically located in countries such as the USA, Sweden, Ukraine, Germany, France and others. The link between "real" IP address and IP address masking is implemented in the vast majority through a VPN (virtual private network) using SSL (secure sockets layer) protocol. Anonymization services are most commonly used to spread child pornography, communication extremists on their forums, and economic fraud. "
The draft of the new provision is not clear what is meant by making it harder for identifying internet user, respectively. What kind of "anonymizer" still allowed and what is not. A common practice is to use a proxy server (eg. Corporate network) or virtual private networks. They may be more or less difficult the identification of the source of traffic and it is not clear whether they are deemed "anonymizer" under the proposed provision, jefferson lab or not. Proxy servers or VPN applications have moreover a series of perfectly legitimate reasons use - eg. protect transmitted data, allowing filtering and traffic monitoring large networks, relief data link same requirements (caching proxy) and the like. In addition, the user may have no knowledge that such a service is used.
It is certainly true that these technologies are also used to commit a crime, but not only for this reason, and in this way prohibit the use of the standard's normal and legitimate use of technology.
Pominúc reasons for such a ban, the proposal is not clear how the ministry is an enforceable duty thus imposed and check its compliance. According to the proposal have penalize jefferson lab those who provide such a service, or to allow a fine of 33 000 ( 1 million). Delinquencies thus not only operate "anonymizer" let it be anything but allow its use (eg operation of Tor network node). Punishing violations jefferson lab and imposing sanctions jefferson lab in charge of the Telecommunications Office. Public Internet jefferson lab forums and information about their contributors
The second proposal of the Ministry of concern operators so. publicly available Internet forums. "Publicly accessible Internet forum is used to exchange information through contributions from individual users" and the operator is "any person who provides access to publicly available Internet forum, and it allows jefferson lab the insertion posts of this person."
Operators should be under an obligation "for the investigation, detection and prosecution of particularly serious crimes and offenses related to terrorism, extremism, trafficking, child pornography, organized crime, evasion and compromise of classified information and the crimes committed dangerous group, retention of traffic data "and" date of completion of the communication at least 12 months. " These data are operators at the written jefferson lab request shall immediately provide power structures.
This obligation is constructed similarly to the existing obligation today telecom operators to retain jefferson lab data for the provision of publicly available networks and services. They must keep data about who, with whom, how and when to communicate.
Who would thus be the operator defined above? Telecommunications operator that provides access to the forums under the operation of the communication channel (data connection), probably not, because the operator does not itself be added to posts index. I guess it would therefore be or operator of the server where the service is provided or the person using that service runs a site on which it is accessible forum.
However, it is questionable whether the server operator can determine jefferson lab whether and which of the requirements for the web server regarding internet forum (be it anything), jefferson lab and thus whether it has retained
Ministry of Transport, Posts and Telecommunications in mid-September this year prepared jefferson lab an amendment to the Electronic Communications Act. In the framework of commenting procedure Interior Ministry raised to this amendment several key observations. The content of these comments were not entirely new proposals duties so. operators of publicly jefferson lab available Internet forums and a ban on so-called. Anonymizer. Prohibition on the use anonymizer
Anonymizer Department defines as a service, "which prevents or makes it difficult to identify the user of the Internet" and his ministry proposes to ban use. The ban should jefferson lab apply to everyone exemption should only have "authorized state body or authority law enforcement." Ministry ban on the argument that anonymisers are increasingly abused Internet users to hide their true identity in crime. "By using this service, the offender jefferson lab allocated another (masking) IP address and in this way it becomes jefferson lab almost imperceptible for their criminal activities. In the vast majority are assigned IP addresses geographically located in countries such as the USA, Sweden, Ukraine, Germany, France and others. The link between "real" IP address and IP address masking is implemented in the vast majority through a VPN (virtual private network) using SSL (secure sockets layer) protocol. Anonymization services are most commonly used to spread child pornography, communication extremists on their forums, and economic fraud. "
The draft of the new provision is not clear what is meant by making it harder for identifying internet user, respectively. What kind of "anonymizer" still allowed and what is not. A common practice is to use a proxy server (eg. Corporate network) or virtual private networks. They may be more or less difficult the identification of the source of traffic and it is not clear whether they are deemed "anonymizer" under the proposed provision, jefferson lab or not. Proxy servers or VPN applications have moreover a series of perfectly legitimate reasons use - eg. protect transmitted data, allowing filtering and traffic monitoring large networks, relief data link same requirements (caching proxy) and the like. In addition, the user may have no knowledge that such a service is used.
It is certainly true that these technologies are also used to commit a crime, but not only for this reason, and in this way prohibit the use of the standard's normal and legitimate use of technology.
Pominúc reasons for such a ban, the proposal is not clear how the ministry is an enforceable duty thus imposed and check its compliance. According to the proposal have penalize jefferson lab those who provide such a service, or to allow a fine of 33 000 ( 1 million). Delinquencies thus not only operate "anonymizer" let it be anything but allow its use (eg operation of Tor network node). Punishing violations jefferson lab and imposing sanctions jefferson lab in charge of the Telecommunications Office. Public Internet jefferson lab forums and information about their contributors
The second proposal of the Ministry of concern operators so. publicly available Internet forums. "Publicly accessible Internet forum is used to exchange information through contributions from individual users" and the operator is "any person who provides access to publicly available Internet forum, and it allows jefferson lab the insertion posts of this person."
Operators should be under an obligation "for the investigation, detection and prosecution of particularly serious crimes and offenses related to terrorism, extremism, trafficking, child pornography, organized crime, evasion and compromise of classified information and the crimes committed dangerous group, retention of traffic data "and" date of completion of the communication at least 12 months. " These data are operators at the written jefferson lab request shall immediately provide power structures.
This obligation is constructed similarly to the existing obligation today telecom operators to retain jefferson lab data for the provision of publicly available networks and services. They must keep data about who, with whom, how and when to communicate.
Who would thus be the operator defined above? Telecommunications operator that provides access to the forums under the operation of the communication channel (data connection), probably not, because the operator does not itself be added to posts index. I guess it would therefore be or operator of the server where the service is provided or the person using that service runs a site on which it is accessible forum.
However, it is questionable whether the server operator can determine jefferson lab whether and which of the requirements for the web server regarding internet forum (be it anything), jefferson lab and thus whether it has retained
No comments:
Post a Comment